PrivacyCheck editorial team — sources, review, accountability

PrivacyCheck is maintained by FFCheck-redactie, the editorial team behind every FFCheck pillar. We don't use AI-generated content as-is. Every article cites primary sources — AP guidance, EDPB guidelines, EU regulation text, Dutch case law — and every figure carries a named, dated reference.

Sourcing standards

Primary sources only: Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens (AP), European Data Protection Board (EDPB), EUR-Lex (regulation text), Dutch courts (rechtspraak.nl), CJEU rulings, and authoritative legal commentaries. We do not cite blog posts, AI summaries, or commercial vendor pages as primary sources — only as context.

Review cadence

Every article is reviewed at least once per quarter against current AP guidance + EDPB publications + recent CJEU rulings. Material legal changes (new EDPB guideline, new CJEU judgment, AP enforcement decision) trigger an immediate review of all relevant articles.

Corrections

Found an error? Email redactie@ffcheck.nl. We confirm receipt within 48 hours and correct material errors within 5 business days, with a visible correction note on the article.

Editorial independence

FFCheck is published by Goat Pixels (Amsterdam, KvK 82724822). We do not accept affiliate fees from law firms, privacy-policy generators, or compliance vendors. The paid SKUs on PrivacyCheck (e.g. document generators) are our own products — that's how we fund the free articles. No advertising, no third-party trackers, no data resale.

Disclaimer

PrivacyCheck publishes plain-language information about privacy + GDPR. It is not legal advice and does not create an adviser-client relationship. For serious disputes contact a qualified lawyer (advocaat), the Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens directly, or Het Juridisch Loket for free first-line legal help.